Post by EMPATHY on Jan 7, 2010 6:06:41 GMT 1
I was asked a question by our forum member Lemonbread.
The question was - is Michael an Ambassador for Planet Earth?
A good question I feel and interesting what this card tells us. This card is about interference.
It basically indicates that one learns a valuable lesson from the unexpected consequences of prior decisions. They narrowly escaping criticism, censure, and the imposition of external restrictions. They find they are focusing on the crux of a problem and freeing oneself from a difficult situation. This has them coming to grips with a past failure or humiliation and moving on.
In short that to me seems very much like Michael was an Ambassador as such but as you can see - his views brought about CENSURE and Restriction. Clearly whatever Michael wanted to say or whatever he felt he was 'curbed' in the process. Perhaps even that was for his own good. Sometimes when we speak out too much we can put ourselves in the most difficult of situations that we then have to get out of with the least possible discomfort.
This card suggests that perhaps Michael was in a prison which was 'self made' through his feelings and thoughts towards others - the humiliation that he suffered and the interference that blocked his life from 1992 to 2005 is very apparent in this card - it is a time when his voice meant a great deal, when he was able to speak how he wished then found that 'interference' in his thoughts and his wishes were thwarting his attempts at perhaps freeing other peoples minds.
Its a bit of a sad card because Michael probably felt he could do much good but with so little on his side and with so much humiliation interfering with his life - it was acting as a situation that he had to escape from. Perhaps it may relate to the years when he was speaking his mind - remember Sony? Michael had a great deal of humanitarian issues he wanted to back and support and continued to do what he could, his voice however was taken away and perhaps this 'released' him from Ambassador status in that he was not able to continue that role freely.
Michael would have been censured - and he was.
So I dont know if this card answers the question or not, the card may have taken the issue literally - or figuratively - but that is the answer I have been given.
The question was - is Michael an Ambassador for Planet Earth?
A good question I feel and interesting what this card tells us. This card is about interference.
It basically indicates that one learns a valuable lesson from the unexpected consequences of prior decisions. They narrowly escaping criticism, censure, and the imposition of external restrictions. They find they are focusing on the crux of a problem and freeing oneself from a difficult situation. This has them coming to grips with a past failure or humiliation and moving on.
In short that to me seems very much like Michael was an Ambassador as such but as you can see - his views brought about CENSURE and Restriction. Clearly whatever Michael wanted to say or whatever he felt he was 'curbed' in the process. Perhaps even that was for his own good. Sometimes when we speak out too much we can put ourselves in the most difficult of situations that we then have to get out of with the least possible discomfort.
This card suggests that perhaps Michael was in a prison which was 'self made' through his feelings and thoughts towards others - the humiliation that he suffered and the interference that blocked his life from 1992 to 2005 is very apparent in this card - it is a time when his voice meant a great deal, when he was able to speak how he wished then found that 'interference' in his thoughts and his wishes were thwarting his attempts at perhaps freeing other peoples minds.
Its a bit of a sad card because Michael probably felt he could do much good but with so little on his side and with so much humiliation interfering with his life - it was acting as a situation that he had to escape from. Perhaps it may relate to the years when he was speaking his mind - remember Sony? Michael had a great deal of humanitarian issues he wanted to back and support and continued to do what he could, his voice however was taken away and perhaps this 'released' him from Ambassador status in that he was not able to continue that role freely.
Michael would have been censured - and he was.
So I dont know if this card answers the question or not, the card may have taken the issue literally - or figuratively - but that is the answer I have been given.