Post by EMPATHY on Aug 29, 2009 5:12:04 GMT 1
Though we want to believe in fairy tales I dont think this card is. This card as all tarot cards here represents aspects of the past present or the future. Which it is, we have to toss a coin.
What you see here is the card I have received in respect of whether Michael is with his children August 2009. I meant physically. This card shows us that there is a huge problem with this. Now just because I say August 2009, the tarot can be pretty ignorant - ignoring my date question and giving me an overall view of any of the time pockets.
I am never happy about reciting times on tarot cards as often I can be wrong. However the dates of this card upright would be referring to December 13 to December 20 - which year that wants to place itself in is another matter.
When this card is upright it gives us south summer and noon and I always look at the polar opposite of that which would give us North Winter and time either side of the day.
I already showed to you a XMAS TREE tonight in one of the tarots of 28 August.
Now December is the Xmas months.
I imagine Michael spent his last Xmas at NORTH carolwood Drive and the number of the house was 100 - this card as you can see is the number 10. That already could form part of that address.
But look at this card. Its not a particularly happy one. Would I be feeling from this card perhaps there was some obstructions going on at Xmastime or about Xmas time?
What I see in this card are overbearing attitudes, slander too and perhaps oppression difficulties and a general feeling that responsibility is delegated regarding the children because one has many things going on and perhaps Michael has not wanted to do this. I have mentioned before that I felt somehow that people were interfering - Im not sure how, but I had the impression that either he might have thought or others might have thought that he could not face up to doing all the things he needed to do for the children when so many things were placed at his door to do.
I think there is a lot of opposition in this card. But we were talking about August and this year. From this card it seems to imply that perhaps if some people think he is holed up somewhere with them that in fact that is not the truth as such. The obstacles in this card dont seem to be helpful.
As this card stands for action as all wands do, and often land and estate, homes and buildings, as it shows the reverse of this it makes me somehow feel that the question may not be viable considering that it is reversed. It does not have the energy in it for accomplishment and for this card and the question I dont see Michael with his children in Aug 2009
I think there is a lawsuit still pending somewhere about Michaels children - but I feel that might have turned up or was in someones thoughts perhaps in December. I know that there have been movements for custody over the children because of Michaels 'death' but this card keeps pointing me to December so Im inclined to feel that around that time of year there was something wrong and some kind of problem going on. I almost feel that the lawsuit was going to result in a loss anyway. Now thats an odd thing to see assuming this card is correct.
Health issues - tension (neck and shoulder); headaches; vision; overwork. All of these health issues would have been hovering over Michael. I think this man was worried deep inside. There have been indications over Michaels vision/eyes in the tarot before and this seems to come up here. We know he wore glasses but we dont know the condition of his eyesight. If Michaels eyesight was severely problematic one would have thought surgery/laser would be able to correct that - so Im not quite sure what to think of it and cannot offer more of an explanation for the time being on that.
I do think that Michael was over committed however, and I do think that there was a problem regarding his feelings for the children over this.
Whatever interference Michael may have had I just feel he got to the point where he had enough of something. Some things can just get out of control. I think this was the case long before the beginning of 2009.
I have felt that Michael was in a situation he could not escape from. This card is reversed, I feel he did escape from some problems however. I dont know why I say this and I hope I am forgiven, but I dont think it is/was death that seperated Michael from his children I think it was something else. This card is about trying to imagine a better situation and possibly not having much choice in the matter.
I have a genuine feeling that Michael preferred his children in disguise but there were those who DID NOT.
I see Michael in my mind in the zen tarot in a place of 'ordinariness' being like the common man in a comman man environment.
Tarot is past present and future - somewhere in that great midst of time this card applies. But where?